INS Vikramaditya
INS Vikramaditya |
On Jan 20/04 India and Russia signed a $947 million deal to
refurbish and convert the Soviet/Russian Admiral Gorshkov into a full
carrier, to be re-named Vikramaditya. The announced delivery date for
Vikramaditya was August 2008 – an ambitious schedule, but one that
would allow the carrier to enter service in 2009, around the time as their
29,000t light carrier INs Viraat (formerly HMS Hermes, last of the
Centaur class) was scheduled to retire. The new carrier would berth at the
karwar on India’s west coast.
That was the plan. Unfortunately, the Vikramaditya story is
sadly typical of both Indian defense procurement, and of Russia’s defense
industry.
Initial reports of delays sparked controversy and denials in
India, but subsequent events more than justified them. Slow negotiations and
steadily-lengthening delivery times quickly pushed delivery of the Gorshkov
back to 2010, and then to 2012 or later, even as Russia’s asking price more
than doubled. India’s sunk construction costs, Russian possession of the
Gorshkov, the difficulty in finding a substitute carrier to replace the
Gorshkov sooner than 2013, and the Chinese push with the Varyag, have all
combined to give the Russians substantial leverage in their negotiations. They
have exploited that leverage to the fullest.
Cost estimates and reports concerning the Gorshkov’s final
total now hover in the $2.9 billion range, following the revised project
agreement of March 2010.
As is customary with Indian defense procurement,
transparency arrived only after after all other alternatives had been
exhausted.
Neither assessment turned out to be true, nor subsequent
updates proved the critics to be correct. After the delivery
delays could no longer be denied, the initial approach was to minimize their
length. February 2008 news reports, however, began to give figures of up to 3-4
years before refurbishment and testing could allow the ship to enter service.
Subsequent reports by Indian and Russian sources stressed 2012, or even later.
Those estimates, at least, turned out to be true. INS
Viraat’s retirement was moved to 2012 – but it soon became clear that even that
might not be late enough. The ship was scheduled to retire in 2009, but events
forced India into another refit, leaving the country without a carrier for
almost a year. Even with the refit, Viraat nearing the limits of her mechanical
life, and shortages of flyable sea harrier fighters are creating
issues of their own.
India’s locally-built Vikrant Class escort carrier project
won’t be a solution either, as its delivery date appears to be slipping to 2017
or later.
This leaves India’s Navy with a serious scheduling problem,
and no significant carrier force. They hoped that Vikramaditya’s induction at
the end of 2012 will allow them to field a credible carrier strike group some
time in 2013, but basic engineering flaws mean that even the handover isn’t
likely to take place until late 2013.
Meanwhile, China is working hard to refurbish the 58,000t
ex-Russian carrier Varyag, and has begun tests as of 2012. In September 2012,
reports surfaced that the ship would be named “Liaoning,” in honor of the
province where it was retrofitted.
Comments
Post a Comment